Quinyx vs Dyflexis

The main difference

Quinyx puts the emphasis on AI: creating rosters automatically and forecasting expected busyness per location, so you are not under- or overstaffed. Dyflexis brings planning, hours and costs together in one platform and puts planned and actual hours side by side, so you see deviations in wage costs straight away. Forecasting based on data is a separate module at Dyflexis, Forecasting. Quinyx comes from Sweden and, according to the supplier, works for more than 800 customers in more than 50 countries. Dyflexis comes from The Hague and, according to the supplier, has more than a million users in more than 20 countries, mainly in production and logistics, retail, care, hospitality and leisure.

Choose Quinyx if

• you have many locations and want staffing to depend on expected busyness;
• you want rosters to be created automatically as much as possible;
• you work internationally and want one system for all countries.

Choose Dyflexis if

• you mainly want control over hours and wage costs, with planned and actual hours side by side;
• you are looking for a Dutch supplier with experience in hospitality, retail and leisure;
• you want a demo first: Dyflexis offers one.

What to look out for with both

With both, employees manage their roster, availability and shift swaps in an app. Ask how hours worked and allowances get into your payroll and what it costs per employee or per location.